Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

How To Make Your Managing Editor Bonkers

  • Jul. 8th, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Book Four
Managing Editors are the unsung heroes of publishing.

They aren't the Editor editor, who acquires the book and champions it in-house to sales and marketing (in addition to being the best sounding board the author has), or the assistant editor, who does a lot of the back and forth with the author (and in my case, is one of my most perceptive early readers). But the Managing Editor is the one who also copy edits (minding all the details), edits (as in, for story consistency and clarity), and most importantly keeps the book on track through production to the onsale date. And it's a difficult track to navigate in the best of circumstances.

For readers who are unaware of the production process of a book, publishers like to have them wrapped up and tied with a bow a full year before the release date. This allows them, among other reasons, to adequately promote, market, and sell the book to the booksellers and librarians who they hope will be buying it. The catalogs go out several seasons before the onsale date, so the earlier they have the book in-house the better prepared they'll be to sell it.

To use the Imaginarium Geographica books as an example, I'm supposed to have the first draft and sketches in to my editors in July, with finished art and copyedits done in September for a book to be published in October of the following year. I have rarely hit those marks (although this year, for book five, I was early with the mss, and God willing will stay ahead of the curve) and have often gone into spring of the release year to finish the art. However, with this series there's been a little grace given and a little flexibility - with a draft of the mss, a finished cover, and thumbnails, my publisher has been able to do almost everything they need to do, saleswise. The bulk of our buyers know what to expect, and the sales force knows how to sell a James Owen Imaginarium Geographica book. Such is the power of a series and a known quantity. But it's still better (for a PLETHORA of reasons) to be on time, not the least of which is that it keeps your Managing Editor from having a coronary.

I know (as does the reading public) that some authors whose name alone sells books, can push the limits of these schedules and deadlines. Neii Gaiman has often mentioned in his blog that he's been working on a book as late as the season before pub date. That's scary - but then again, he also knows what he's doing, and his publisher obviously trusts that he knows what he's doing. But I'm certain that the Managing Editor overseeing those books is still sweating bullets.

However, this last weekend at the Westercon in Tempe, it was revealed to me that Neil and I are mere pikers when it comes to deadlines.

A very successful author (whom I know well enough, as an Arizona author, to consider a friendly acquaintance) held a kaffeeklatsch where she casually mentioned that she has a new book coming out in October, and lamented the fact that it wasn't going to start at #1 on the bestseller lists, as it's going on sale a week after Dan Brown's new book. She didn't mention the size (Book Page, which carried the announcement, lists the book as being 982 pages) but said she had considered not coming to the con at all since she was still writing the book.

Still. Writing. The. BOOK.

In July.

Section three alone is in the range of 100,000 words, and of seven sections, she had part of section six and all of section seven to go (I may be remembering incorrectly, as she did say she writes out of order... also, all of the blood had drained from my head.) Whatever it was, she still had a LOT to write to finish. And had a vacation coming up.

Also, because she was running so late in the game, the foreign translators were translating sections AS SHE FINISHED THEM, with the understanding that copyedits were yet to come. Same with the person recording the audiobook, which would have to have corrections spliced in. The really fun part is that her old editor was let go last December, so it's a new editor who is in the middle of this (and hadn't even READ her older books yet). The learning curve alone had to be bonkers.

Now, everyone already knows that this book will be a bestseller. It WILL make money for the publisher. But dear Lord, what a nightmare of coordination, especially for the team at her publisher, who somehow have to keep the train on the track, even without half the cars they need.

This may work for them, but it was, to me, the ultimate cautionary tale. Having once been on a tight schedule (with my comic books) and then watching that schedule evaporate (when I broke my drawing hand in the car accident), I never want to tempt fate in that way. And being on schedule means less pressure for everybody, so I'm planning on staying that way - if only to keep my Managing Editor from losing her mind. Because without her, things don't work.

So, this is a hug and a high-five to Dorothy Gribbin at Simon & Schuster. She makes my job easier. I shouldn't make hers harder.

Comments

( 30 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]tchernabyelo wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 07:32 pm (UTC)
It's not uncommon that for certain authors, whose early books sell very well, later books are large, sprawling beasts that seem to be in bad need of an edit.

An interesting insight as to how this can occur. Just as, in computing, develpoment deadlines slip but delivery deadlines don't, compressing testing and inevitably resuling in buggy code being released, so here we see the writing deadlines slip but the release deadline remaining firm.
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 07:47 pm (UTC)
Great analogy. And yes, that's what I thought of. My own books improve considerably with edits - I wouldn't want to skip the process because there was no time left to do it before the book comes out.
[info]strangerface wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:08 pm (UTC)
Dorothy Gribbin, yay! :D

That last book sounds like a nightmare. I'm sure that managing editor is tearing his/her hair out. But such things happen, especially if you know the author will sell well and really want to get it out for the Christmas season. (Summer is also bad but Fall is the worst for crash books, I find.) There are only so many books a season that can be done that way before the whole staff quits though.

It's nice of you to be considerate of the managing editor. Some authors don't want a lot of editing or copy editing so maybe they are okay with it all going at a break-neck speed, I suppose. It may also be that the printing schedule is different for that particular book. Yours have lots of illustrations so they might be printed in Asia, and the whole customs issue and shipping makes the process longer.
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:11 pm (UTC)
Most books are printed overseas! It's cheaper overall--in general we only print domestically when we're in a serious rush situation and we don't have a choice.

/editor hat

Edit: Which, er, came out snottier than I intended. [info]strangerface, you are wise and I bow to your wisdom in most things!

Edited at 2009-07-08 08:25 pm (UTC)
[info]strangerface wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:27 pm (UTC)
Oooh. *quakes before the mighty editor hat*

:D

A good portion of the adult trade books are still published in the US. I don't know if I'd say majority though; I'm not that familiar with it. I think that's a difference between children's and adult publishing still. (I guess that means you guys are typically ahead of the curve and/or are more likely to have pretty art.)
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:39 pm (UTC)
Really? Interesting! I guess we're both right, then, when you said that [info]coppervale's books are generally printed overseas because they're illustrated--so many of our books are.

But even most of our novels are printed overseas. It's just cheaper overall!

I wonder if adult has a tighter schedule than us, and that's why they need to print domestically.
[info]strangerface wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:54 pm (UTC)
I wonder if adult has a tighter schedule than us, and that's why they need to print domestically.
They seem to. I get stuff much further in advance from you guys than I do for adult, in general.

And I have the pub schedules to keep track of what books I have and I see the Fairfield PA Quebecor listed as a printer on the adult an awful lot...

Maybe we should interview a children's and adult managing editor and compare contrast what they do!
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:22 pm (UTC)
I'm sure the season is a serious factor: if the publisher CAN get it out for holiday sales, everyone benefits. And it's not like they haven't done this before (with her and her process).

I'm okay with editing because they trust me, and I trust them. If they make a suggestion, it's only to help clarify the story, which just makes me look smarter. But conversely, if something is important to me that is stays as is, they don't argue with me. And in one case (on the upcoming SHADOW DRAGONS), N made a GREAT suggestion about one of the bad guys that changed the direction of the series.

So, we've gone on tight schedules before - but I think I'll be happier staying ahead!

Edited at 2009-07-08 08:23 pm (UTC)
[info]ellenmillion wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:35 pm (UTC)
This would explain a lot of not-first best-seller books I've read.

I am such a huge fan of the editorial process, it's cringe-worthy to think of a writer treating it so casually. That poor, poor new editor.
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 08:53 pm (UTC)
I can just imagine him reading the backlist - a dozen thousand-page books... ;)
[info]janni wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 09:46 pm (UTC)
What scares me about being translated as I write is that I write so non-linearly--or rather, I write linearly, but the stuff that happens later always echoes backwards and requires changes to make it fit ...
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 10:06 pm (UTC)
Same here. I JUST got the editor's letter on the new book, and I utterly depend on them to catch the stuff I miss in puzzling together the sections I write.

Loved being on that panel with you, BTW. You're a lot of fun to be around!
[info]janni wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 10:13 pm (UTC)
I really enjoyed our panel, too!
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 01:37 am (UTC)
Oh man, I WISH I could have been there! Two of my favorite writerly people on a panel together! It must have been fabulous. What was the topic?
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 01:45 am (UTC)
Classic Children's Lit.
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 01:50 am (UTC)
Here's the writeup:

LIT – CHILDREN’S CLASSICS…TODAY. What children’s literature today has the possibility of becoming a classic? Will Harry Potter make it? (find other examples to name – Paolini, Ridley Pearson)

Thurs 7p-8p, Xavier room. Janni Lee Simner (moderator), James Owen, Michelle Welch, Aprilynne Pike
[info]janni wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 05:04 pm (UTC)
Since we both live in the same state, clearly now you have all the excuse you need to come to Arizona. :-)
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 09:03 pm (UTC)
I've already been working her over on that. ;)
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 07:03 pm (UTC)
Luring me with promises of guestrooms, lanterna magicas and salt and vinegar potato chips...you are a wily man.
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 07:13 pm (UTC)
The running favorite activity of Studio guests is lying in the middle of the North lawn at midnight, eating homemade peach pie under the Milky Way.

And Janni's only a few hours away, herself... ;)
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 07:16 pm (UTC)
First taunting, now tempting...what's next in the [info]coppervale bag of tricks?
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 08:14 pm (UTC)
That's pretty much my whole range - I'm just really good at it.

Did I mention the fairy forest off the East lawn?
[info]penmage wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 08:17 pm (UTC)
You know you're not playing fair!
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 10th, 2009 08:25 pm (UTC)
There's also a Children's/YA bookstore not two blocks away, in an old country victorian house. And it could even be a working trip when you come, because we have guest studios here.

But the best place to work, especially in Summer, is on the stage at the front of the big hall upstairs. You can write on your computer while watching the monsoon thunderstorms roll in from across the mountains.
[info]bluestockingbb wrote:
Jul. 8th, 2009 11:58 pm (UTC)
Wow! That's a frightening amount of procrastination. Not to mention chaotic. Sounds like something might get missed in all the running around.
[info]jessicaburkhart wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 11:52 am (UTC)
Team S&S! :)
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 09:03 pm (UTC)
This is how we rock. And this is how we roll. ;)
[info]compa_mighty wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 01:47 pm (UTC)
Unrelated, sorry
[info]coppervale wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 09:11 pm (UTC)
Re: Unrelated, sorry
Holy cats! That's awesome! Thank you for posting this!
[info]quennessa wrote:
Jul. 9th, 2009 03:44 pm (UTC)
Holy gods.

Her managing editor must be drinking him/herself to death.

Just reading that scares *me* to death.
( 30 comments — Leave a comment )